Skip to main content

Sample Marketing Assignment: Servicescape Model for Ginger Brand of Hotel Chains

Business students who are majoring in marketing come across different assignments including case studies requiring the application of critical thinking skills. In such, marketing case studies or assignments, students are required to apply the concepts learned in class to real life business problems. This can be quite challenging especially when a learner lacks critical thinking and analysis skills. This is why most students seek marketing case study assignment help from online academic writing services such as prolificresearchpaperwriters.com. Our marketing case study writers have worked on different marketing assignments and they have proved their worth by assisting students to get A+.  Here is a sample marketing case study that scholars may come across in their studies.

Question

Apply the servicescape model to Ginger: smart Basic case study using Bitner, Durna and the pages I am attaching from : Lovelock, C. & Wirtz, J. (2011) Services Marketing: People, Technology, Strategy, 7th Edition, Pearson.
Answer

Introduction

The case study focuses on a hotel chain that is based in India and is known as Ginger. The hotel chain targets the economy market segment which has been neglected by other players in the market. Ginger seeks to set its brand apart by providing affordable accommodation and related services that are characterized by convenience, simplicity, affordability, modernity, style, and warmth among others. This paper applies the servicescape model on the Ginger brand.

The Servicescape Model

The model focuses on the components of the physical environment within which service delivery takes place. The servicescape model is founded on the hypothesis that the physical environment has an influence on both employee and customer behaviors. Additionally, the physical environment can facilitate or serve as a limitation towards the attainment of internal and external marketing goals in an organization. In the hospitality industry, it can be utilized to conveniently assess the customer experiences (Bitner, 1992). Notably, the model is made up of both substantive components and communicative components. Examples of communicative components include politeness, concern, and culture delivery. Substantive components include décor and design, ambience service, and convenience among others (Durna, Dedeoglu, & Balikçioglu, 2015).

The key dimensions of the service environment as the ambient conditions, space or functionality, and signs, symbols, and artifacts. It is important to ensure that the dimensions fit together holistically since the service environment can lead to diverse customer and employee responses. However, the responses are moderated by different factors. For example, the responses are moderated by cognitive, emotional, and psychological factors. Cognitive factors include beliefs, categorization, and symbolic meaning while emotional factors include feelings, moods, and attitudes. On the other hand, the psychological factors are composed of pain, comfort, movement, and physical fit (Lovelock & Wirtz, 2011).

Applying the Servicescape Model to Ginger Brand of Hotel Chains

The servicescape model can be related to the dimensions of Ginger’s service concept. For example, the Ginger hotels align their facilities with the modern lifestyles by leveraging technology in order to attain efficiency. Additionally, this leads to simplicity and convenience in the business process. Besides, this resonates with the middle class customers and influence their beliefs and attitudes towards the hotels. For example, the use of emails for booking rooms and the use of payment gateways creates an impression that the hotels’ processes are very efficient. Bitner (1992) emphasized that the customers’ perspectives towards the servicescape lead to cognitive responses which determine their beliefs about the businesses employees and products. Additionally, customers are able to categorize a firm based on their perceptions of the servicescape. For example, clients may categorize the Ginger hotels as stylish and modern based on the use of technology to achieve different tasks in the hotels. Notably, the brand can leverage this component in its advertisements with the aim of enhancing this image and using at as factor for attracting customers (Durna et al., 2015). This is because customers utilize extrinsic cues to infer or form beliefs about quality of the services provided by a business (Bitner, 1992).

Ginger hotels also focus on creating an impression of style and warmth. The brand uses compact fluorescent lights (CFL), natural lighting, auto-time managed air-conditioning, and energy-efficient hydro-pneumatic systems. These components create an ambience that is very conducive for customers. According to Lovelock and Wirtz (2011) ambient conditions affect the customers’ emotional well-being, attitudes, and behaviors. Consequently, it is important to create a service environment that is desired by customers. The authors noted that lighting, temperature, and smells as some of the factors that impact on ambience. Notably, customers are willing to consume services which are provided within an ambient environment (Bitner, 1992).

The hotels have a conducive layout, equipment, and furnishings. The Ginger brand considers all types of travelers ranging from the lone travelers and people with disabilities. Additionally, the rooms have ergonomic working areas, coffee makers, and mini-fridges among other equipment. The use of posture-pedic mattresses enhances the customer experiences through the concept of SMART Sleep. The equipment facilitates functionality in the hotels by aiding service provision. Additionally, the equipment also ensures that the customers have a positive service experience (Lovelock & Wirtz, 2011).

Employees are also key stakeholders of the servicescape model. The Ginger brand invests in the workers by training them. The firm recruits top talent from the hotel management school through the use of a multi-step recruitment and training process. Additionally, the company also provides career progression opportunities to its employees. The employees are motivated through non-monetary rewards such as developing their competencies. The firm makes use of in-house training, induction, training operations, and e-learning modules. Training can enable employees to acquire the right attitudes and behaviors such as politeness that are important for service delivery within the hospitality industry (Durna et al., 2015).

However, the Ginger brand needs to work on its communication to customers in order to avoid customer complaints and negative feedback. The case study indicates that at times customers are not aware that the company does not provide room service, valet, and concierge. This has created an expectation-perception gap. The company needs to utilize more explicit signs and symbols to communicate this message to the customers.

Conclusion

The servicescape model can be applied to improve service delivery within the hospitality industry. Hotels should focus on the key components of the model as a means of enhancing the customer experience and creating a positive brand image. These components include ambient conditions, space or function, and signs, symbols, and artifacts. Hotels should also recognize that employees are key stakeholders in efficient service delivery. In this regard, they should invest in and motivate employees through career development opportunities and monetary and non-monetary rewards.

If you like the way this case study has been written, you can always engage our customer support team so that they may help you to place an order for your assignment. Please also note that apart from case studies, we also offer assistance with essays and coursework assignments. Students can order our essay writing help in order to get a custom essay. Scholars can also order for coursework assignment help from our dedicated writers.

A Termination by Any Other Name: Sample APA Case Study

Looking for experienced case study writers? You have found the right custom writing firm. We have professionals who are ever ready to offer assistance when our clients request for urgent case study help.  You can review one of our pre-written sample case study below.

Introduction

            Jeffrey Deck is an Assistant Federal Security Director attached to the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) at Raleigh-Durham Airport, North Carolina. Jeffrey is being terminated due to reports he had filed implicating his supervisor Bob Jewel of incompetence and misconduct including a highly publicized security breach at the airport. The reports had attracted the attention of the TSA’s Professional Review Board (PRB) which is responsible for reviewing allegations of misconduct and mismanagement among TSA’s senior officials. After the review, the board decided to terminate both Jeffrey and Bob. Jeffrey was notified about a meeting between him and the board through email three weeks to the meeting.  However, the board acknowledged that Jeffrey was not responsible for the misconduct since Bob, the Security Director, was responsible for providing leadership. TSA gave Jeffrey the option of resigning for ‘personal reasons’ as opposed to summary dismissal without benefits.

TSA representatives denied Jeffrey the opportunity to view the contents of his dismissal letter. The justification for this was that by viewing the contents of the letter, Jeffrey would have been served with a termination notice, prompting TSA to file the termination details including the reason for termination in Jeffrey’s file. Summary dismissal would prevent Jeffrey from being considered for federal employment opportunities in the future. Jeffrey noted that he could contest the removal proposal. However, the board was adamant that a change in management was required and pressured Jeffrey to take the resignation option. On request for three days time to consider the decision and consult with his attorney, Jeff was given an hour to call his attorney. Jeffrey is indirectly being terminated for whistle blowing on his supervisor.  By reporting the mismanagement of the security docket, Jeffrey brought out the incompetence and irresponsibility of top leadership in the docket. The PRB after its review was, therefore, convinced of the need to change the docket’s management personnel.

Body

            Jeffrey reported Bob’s misconduct without first engaging him on the same. This indicates Jeffrey’s inability to establish a proper and honest relationship with his boss. However, by reporting the mismanagement, Jeffrey took the right action since employees have a responsibility of reporting misconduct and mismanagement by their seniors. This responsibility is founded on laws such as Sarbanes-Oxley Act that encourages corporate officers to fight corporate mismanagement (Watnick, 2007). Nevertheless, Jeffrey overlooked the alternative of first raising the mismanagement concerns with Bob before reporting them. Raising the concerns with Bob, may have elicited a better relationship between Jeffrey and Bob. In doing so, Jeffrey would have used the strategy of substantiality whereby subordinates manage their leaders by offering important information and guidance to the leaders (McShane & Von Glinow, 2010). This would also have served as a wake up call for Bob to consider the impact of his decisions and conduct on other members of his team. This is founded on the concept of centrality since leaders such as Bob are closer to the organizational internal structure and have higher levels of control (McShane & Von Glinow, 2010). It is very unlikely that Jeffrey would be able to establish and maintain strong relationships with the TSA, especially if his attorney were to advise him to sue the TSA for wrongful dismissal. Failure to take the provided option would also jeopardize future relationships with other federal service leaders since he would not be in a position to gain federal employment. However, there are minimal chances that a relationship with the TSA could be maintained if he decides to retire voluntarily.

Jeffrey is a responsible leader who upholds integrity and professionalism. This argument is founded on the fact that he readily reported the misconduct of his boss. Moreover, the conduct and decisions of leaders are informed by their character and ethical values (Chadler, 2009).  His integrity, responsibility and regard for organizational procedures, is evident from his concern over misconduct including the security breach whereby more than 200 bags on a flight to New York were not screened for security purposes. Additionally, rising to the Assistant Federal Security Director is also evidence that Jeffrey effectively managed his professional responsibilities and priorities.

Jeffrey communicates effectively, both verbally and in writing. This is founded on the fact that he was able to effectively relay Bob’s misconduct in the reports he filed. He also demonstrates effective verbal communication during his meeting with the TSA representatives. Lack of communication between Jeffrey and Bob contributed to the problem. The problem is, however, amplified by the PRB board’s decision to review TSA’s management.  Communication is an essential tool for conflict management in organizations (Spaho, 2013). Though, negotiations between Jeffrey and the PRB representatives could resolve the issue, the representatives are very adamant on Jeffrey’s resignation. The board also appears to be in a hurry and negotiations are time consuming (Bornstein & Gilula, 2003).  This position could further amplify the issue especially if Jeffrey were to refuse to resign and sue the TSA over wrongful dismissal.

The issue was not properly resolved. This is majorly attributed to the adamant position of TSA’s representatives who stressed that Jeffrey should either retire or be dismissed summarily. This hindered negotiation efforts between the two parties. TSA representatives especially adopted a threat strategy during the meeting by stressing the consequences of failure to resign voluntarily. A threat tactic is founded on deterrence whereby, during negotiations the side holding a better position presents the weaker side with the consequences of failing to accept the proposed solution (Spaho, 2013). Further, there was no reference to organizational disciplinary and termination procedures.

Conclusion

            The issue would have been handled in a better manner if the parties had referred to disciplinary and termination procedures. Public sector firms should adopt such procedures in order to fairly deal with employee disciplinary and termination issues. This would also eliminate chances of lawsuits from unfairly terminated employees. Management changes should also be carried out in a manner that promotes fairness and justice especially to responsible leaders. Employees who uphold high integrity should be rewarded rather than punished.

Looking for assistance with working on your case study assignment, capstone, thesis, action research, essay, or dissertation? You can now access our case study writing service at very affordable prices. We write our clients’ papers from scratch to ensure that they are original and 100% free of plagiarism.

References

Bornstein, G., & Gilula, Z. (2003). Between-group communication and conflict resolution in assurance and chicken games. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 47(3), 326-339.

Chandler, D. J. (2009). The perfect storm of leader’s unethical behavior: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 5(1), 70-93.

McShane, S. L., & Von Glinow, M. A. Y. (2010). Organizational behavior: Emerging knowledge and practice for the real world. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Irwin.

Spaho, K. (2013). Organizational communication and conflict management. Management: Journal of Contemporary Management Issues18(1), 103-118.

Watnick, V. (2007). Whistleblower protections under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act: A primer and a critique. Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law12(5), 831-879.

 

 

Get 10% Off Today! Discount Code: PRPW10

Affordabale priced research paper writing service